While Pakistan President Asif Ali Zardari is in the United States discussing U.S. military strikes across Pakistan’s border, Army Chief General Ashfaq Kayani is on a far less publicized trip to China to talk about defense cooperation. The timing may be coincidental, but the potential implications of the United States and China playing competing roles in Pakistan are huge.
Pakistan has always seen China as a much more reliable friend, while support from Washington has waxed and waned in line with U.S. interests (Islamabad has never quite forgiven the United States for using it to fight the Soviet Union in Afghanistan and then dropping it when the Russians were driven out in 1989.)
And nowadays the difference in the approaches of Pakistan’s two giant allies is even more striking. While the United States and Pakistan argue about U.S. cross-border strikes, China has quietly reaffirmed its commitment to keeping Pakistan stable.
In a condolence message sent after this weekend’s Marriott Hotel bombing, Chinese Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi said, “As a good neighbour and all-time friend of Pakistan, China will always support the unremitting efforts made by the government and people of Pakistan to safeguard the country’s stability.”
Of course there is no reason to jump to the conclusion the United States and China will become outright rivals over Pakistan — both have a stake in Pakistan’s stability, and in the past both have managed to maintain close ties with Islamabad without tripping over each other. But the current scenario certainly increases the chances of friction.
Add to that the fact that the strategic picture in South Asia has changed dramatically under the Bush administration. The United States has rewritten its relationship with India — which was still seen as in the Soviet camp back in the days of the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan –turning it into a crucial ally in Asia and potential bulwark against Chinese influence. It sealed that transformation by reaching a deal with India effectively recognising it as a nuclear power, ignoring any misgivings in China (India’s nuclear weapons programme was developed as much, if not more, as a defence against China as against Pakistan.)
So it will be interesting to see what Kayani brings back from China and Zardari from the United States in the way of promises of support. Will the United States and China be able to work together to pull Pakistan out of its current crisis? Or are they drifting into a situation where they end up opposing each other?
Courtesy: Reuters
Sphere: Related ContentRelated posts:
- World Safer Place Because of Bush - Asif Zardari
- Pakistan Not Doing Enough? - Part II
- Pakistan Not Doing Enough?
- Bush Had No Plan to Catch Osama bin Laden
- How Sarah Palin Rallied Pakistan’s Feminists - Time
- The Long Road to Chaos in Pakistan
- Why Pakistan is Useful Just the Way it is - An Indian Perspective
Browse Timeline
Comments ( 2 )
Waqar opined on Sep 24 08 at 10:41 pmThe last two questions do force my hand to pen down a few words. You must have heard the saying quite often that ” there are no permenant friends or foes in politics” You know once such theories are tabled by the Pakistani polititions one attributes it to their talking through the hat. I would thus rather rephrase it by saying that “there are absolutely no friends or foes in polotics , it is only a matter of convenience” China and USA are wise enough not to dampen their relations for Pakistan. They have much more stakes being grilled elsewhere which can be lost over this piece of cake. Look at the amount of $ being pumped into the Chinese industry by the American multinationals vis a vis the trade that China enjoys with the Americans. Would they sacrifize all that for Pakistan. WELL RE THINK ON THAT….. Since this is not all. Both will always persue their objectives surely and relentlessly disregarding the so called SOVERIGNITY AND INTEGRITY OF PAKISTAN, so much for their stake in the stability in Pakistan. I pray that we are granted the wisdom and political acumen to play our cards right keeping our national intrests in the fore front. TX. WAQAR






























